GMAT寫作范文示例與作文點評
來源：互聯(lián)網(wǎng)
小編：白麗 751考生們選好作文題目肯定是最為關(guān)鍵的一步，下面就來為大家整理GMAT寫作范文示例與高分作文點評，期望可以幫助大家備考GMAT寫作考試帶來更多的幫助。
作文點評
1、GMAT作文字數(shù)要達到599words, 完全的體現(xiàn)了字數(shù)為王的判分傾向。
2、GMAT考試時采取了標準的五段制，首段、末端，中間三段，看上去很美。
3、不會有陳詞濫調(diào)、滿篇廢話的模板式語言。
GMAT寫作范文示例：
題目
The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:
"Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money."
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
首段
This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. However, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesn’t necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.
中間段1
The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.
中間段2
This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.
中間段3
Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.
末段
In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment (i.e., coal mine). Before any decision is made, all this things must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expenses.
根據(jù)上文內(nèi)容能夠看出，這篇GMAT作文主要采用了大家熟知的段落結(jié)構(gòu)，整篇文章看上去是相當(dāng)?shù)膬?yōu)美。字數(shù)安排同樣是很合理。希望大家在寫作備考過程中也能多多參考高分滿分范文，從中學(xué)習(xí)總結(jié)出一些規(guī)律和方法，提升自己的寫作實力。
上文介紹了有關(guān)GMAT高分寫作范文示例與高分作文點評的內(nèi)容，建議把范文分成單元，每天規(guī)定自己看五至十篇，讀到一定程度的時候，自然就會熟悉其中的套路，最后做到“讀書破萬卷，下筆如有神”。在對范文非常熟悉之后，就可以總結(jié)出一些經(jīng)驗，最好能形成自己的模板。
