深入解析雅思寫作法律類大作文
來源：
小編： 566環(huán)球教育為各位考生帶來深入剖析雅思法律類大作文，希望對(duì)大家能有所幫助,更多雅思培訓(xùn)內(nèi)容請(qǐng)關(guān)注環(huán)球教育！
A類的雅思大作文大致可以分為教育類，社會(huì)類，科技類，政府類，媒體類，法律類等等，而里面學(xué)生們反映最為廣泛的，感覺最無從下手的題目當(dāng)屬法律類題目。盡管說出題頻率相對(duì)而言并非相當(dāng)?shù)念l繁，但若學(xué)生當(dāng)備考里未實(shí)施合理有效的對(duì)此類話題具有針對(duì)性的總結(jié)和復(fù)習(xí)的話，也許是難以當(dāng)寫作時(shí)能夠得到任何理想的分?jǐn)?shù)。在這篇文章里，是會(huì)通過法律和犯罪所涉及的一些常見話題給大家從其內(nèi)容，語言逐一進(jìn)行分析，希望考生們能夠從中受益。
一. Can capital punishment (death penalty) ever be justified?
是否應(yīng)該有死刑?
這個(gè)題目可以說是一談到法律犯罪這一大類話題時(shí)，最會(huì)經(jīng)常談到的問題。對(duì)于大多數(shù)中國雅思考生，尤其是高中生，大學(xué)生，如果沒有事先經(jīng)過精心準(zhǔn)備的話，對(duì)這個(gè)題目恐怕只能是傻眼了。關(guān)于這個(gè)話題，大致可以分成以下這幾個(gè)分論點(diǎn)來展開：
Arguments against capital punishment
1. 死刑只是對(duì)罪犯的一種處罰，而并不能夠?qū)⒎缸镄袨橹惺芎φ呱旎?，或者賠償其所遭受的傷害。
Capital punishment, which even though manages to bring the criminals to justice, could by no means compensate for physical, mental and psychological sufferings inflicted on victims, or in some extreme cases, bring back their lives.
2. 無論一個(gè)人犯多大的錯(cuò)誤，其他人都無權(quán)剝奪其生命。 (人權(quán))
It is entirely unjustified to deprive one of his/her rights to live regardless of how insanely severe and cruel the offenses he/she has committed are. (This subject matter has boiled to the controversial issue of human rights)
3. 死刑犯的尸體的處理(是否可以用于器官移植等等)將是一個(gè)非常具有爭(zhēng)議的道德問題。
How the body of the deceased criminal is going to be disposed of (used for organ transplant, for instance) will be bound to raise grave both ethical and social implications.
Arguments for capital punishment
1. 如果死刑犯沒有受到最為嚴(yán)厲的懲罰，那么這對(duì)受害者是不公平的。
It would be only fair for the victims if the criminals are subject to the greatest fear of all- death.
2. 如果死刑取消的話，那么很多潛在的罪犯就不會(huì)顧忌做出一些極為可怕的犯罪行為。
If capital punishment is ever to be done away with, the potential wrong-doers wouldn’t be deterred from committing staggeringly serious offenses among which serial murder proves particularly appalling.
二. Should criminals be sent to prisons or placed on education and job retraining?
對(duì)于這個(gè)題目，很多學(xué)生會(huì)非常容易的陷入一個(gè)陷阱，那就是認(rèn)為說如果讓學(xué)生接受教育或就業(yè)培訓(xùn)的話，那就是等同于有充分的人身自由了。其實(shí)不然，這里的教育或就業(yè)培訓(xùn)并不代表說把囚犯與普通的學(xué)生或接受培訓(xùn)者一樣等同的對(duì)待，而是一樣的要限制他們的自由，只不過說不像在監(jiān)獄里整天關(guān)在牢房里無所事事，而是要接受教育和培訓(xùn)。關(guān)于這個(gè)題目，其實(shí)就變成了一個(gè)兩者之間的對(duì)比，可以從以下幾個(gè)方面進(jìn)行論述。
1. 監(jiān)獄同教育或就業(yè)培訓(xùn)相比有很強(qiáng)的阻嚇作用，這樣可以有效的抑制犯罪率的上升。
In stark contrast to placing criminals on educational courses or employment retraining, prisons appeared more effective in deterring potential, would-be wrong doers from committing crimes, thus drastically decreasing the likelihood of rising crime rate.
2. 監(jiān)獄更多的對(duì)罪犯來說是一種懲罰，因此能夠避免再犯。
Being locked up behind the bars is a punitive measure imposed on criminals who are highly unlikely to turn into a recidivist in consideration of their fear of setting foot into jails ever again.
Arguments for education and job retraining
1. 罪犯在監(jiān)獄里所被包圍的是一群囚犯，這對(duì)罪犯的改造不是好的，反而是不好的影響。接受教育可以讓罪犯在一個(gè)積極的環(huán)境里，真正的意識(shí)到對(duì)與錯(cuò)。
“Captivity of negativity” is a terminology intended to describe the destructive, rather than constructive impact on criminals who are locked up in prison, surrounded by people who probably have committed even more serious charges. Education serves to correct any misconception or eliminate twisted thoughts they have by immersing them in a positive environment.
2. 大多數(shù)罪犯往往是沒有什么文化知識(shí)和生存技能，出獄后通常很難找到工作。教育和就業(yè)培訓(xùn)能夠讓他們?cè)谌蘸蟮纳钪锌孔约荷嫦氯?，而不至于因?yàn)闆]有收入來源而再次誤入歧途。
A significant proportion of criminals are sadly illiterate without adequate fundamental knowledge and survival skills and it wouldn’t be easy for them to find a decent job after being released from the jail. With convenient access to education and job retraining, they are able to survive by themselves, greatly reducing the chance of becoming a recidivist in times when they are financially challenged.
三. Should individual choices interfere with the society that is based on rules and laws?
道題目主要討論的核心是一種矛盾。那就是社會(huì)始終是以法規(guī)和法律為基礎(chǔ)的，而有時(shí)社會(huì)的利益往往是與個(gè)人的選擇相矛盾的。當(dāng)這種矛盾發(fā)生時(shí)，應(yīng)該將哪一個(gè)放在首位?為什么?很多考生認(rèn)為這個(gè)題目其實(shí)并不難，但就是不知道如何下手。其實(shí)，這個(gè)題目最為關(guān)鍵的是兩點(diǎn)：如何去法律的范圍還有就是要找到一個(gè)合適法律與個(gè)人選擇發(fā)生沖突的這么一個(gè)結(jié)合點(diǎn)。
對(duì)這個(gè)題目的段落結(jié)構(gòu)以及內(nèi)容的理解如下：
1. 這種矛盾的產(chǎn)生主要是因?yàn)榉煞ㄒ?guī)是從大眾和國家的利益出發(fā)，而個(gè)人利益則絕大多數(shù)情況下是站在個(gè)人角度考慮問題的。一個(gè)有利于個(gè)人的問題如果給其他人造成了無謂的傷害，則是不應(yīng)該允許的。
The conflict of public interest and personal interest accounts largely for the issue of the extent to which is the interference of personal choices justified with the society governed by rules and laws.
這里我們可以舉一個(gè)例子，就知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)(Intellectual Property Rights).很多人都會(huì)去網(wǎng)絡(luò)上下載免費(fèi)電影，音樂以及電子書。這樣做的原因就是正版(authentic copy)相對(duì)中國消費(fèi)者來說太貴。雖然說這看起來合情合理，大多數(shù)人都會(huì)從中受益，但是這也同時(shí)傷害到了娛樂明星們和唱片公司的利益，所以這時(shí)候應(yīng)該以法律為根本，杜絕這種行為。
2. 反過來說，我們不可否認(rèn)個(gè)別特別情況下法律也應(yīng)該給正當(dāng)?shù)膫€(gè)人選擇讓步。
On the other hand, rules and laws should give in to personal choices in some special cases.
比如說，開車送心臟病突然發(fā)作的人趕往醫(yī)院。盡管說途中司機(jī)可能會(huì)闖紅燈(run red lights，會(huì)造成一定的交通混亂，甚至說還有發(fā)生交通事故的可能。但是這樣一種行為應(yīng)該被理解(tolerated). 這是出于法律之外的，但是又合乎情理的。當(dāng)然，這種法律的讓步是有限的，很多時(shí)候確實(shí)很難判斷。所以，無論是法律還是個(gè)人選擇，最終都是從應(yīng)該是整體的利益出發(fā).
以上就是寧波環(huán)球教育為寧波雅思考生們帶來的深入剖析雅思法律類大作文，希望能給寧波雅思考生們帶來幫助。如需了解更多寧波英語培訓(xùn)的相關(guān)信息，歡迎撥打?qū)幉ōh(huán)球教育的免費(fèi)咨詢熱線0574-27889388進(jìn)行咨詢。
